Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, with a score of 98.9 against 82.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's, although it's a little heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better processing power than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.