Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-27 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, having a overall score of 89 against 82.1. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, it's lighter and newer. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little higher pixels amount in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A8 Star features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Galaxy Note10 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.