Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-27 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 general score. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is newer and a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's, but it's also just a bit thicker. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bit larger display, a quite greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.