Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, getting a score of 95.4 against 82.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking display than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a better pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy A8 Star counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 400 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.