Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-27 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, with a general score of 90.7 against 82.1. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is noticeably lighter and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a quite bigger display and a higher pixel density. The Galaxy A8 Star has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a way higher 200 megapixels resolution and a way better video quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.