Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 83.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2020-05-25 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is a bit better than the Galaxy A8 Star, with a overall score of 83.6 against 82.1. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite's body is newer, but a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Galaxy A8 Star. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has an older 10 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a quite bigger display, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.