Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a global score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's score of 82.1. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, it's just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A8 Star. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.