Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-27 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A8 Star, getting an 86.1 score against 82.1. Even being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction is a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Galaxy A8 Star. These devices include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A8 Star. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a way better resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A8 Star features a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 400 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better battery life than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.