Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-27 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a global score of 82.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's score of 77.1. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star is a just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bit bigger display, a lot better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little greater pixel quantity in each display inch. Galaxy A8 Star counts with a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.