Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6's general score of 81.1. Although the Galaxy A80 is heavier than the Google Nexus 6, it's a little thinner and also extremely newer. The Google Nexus 6 has a much better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Google Nexus 6 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy A80 counts with a better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy A80 also has a way more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a little longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.