Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel's global score of 80.2. Although Galaxy A80 is extremely newer than Google Pixel, it is notably heavier and just a little bit thicker. Galaxy A80 features a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Google Pixel counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen density. The Google Pixel counts with as much storage for apps and games as Galaxy A80, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a F2 camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.