Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is much better than the LG G7 Fit, having an 84.9 score against 77. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, Galaxy A80's body is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG G7 Fit. LG G7 Fit counts with a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher pixel density.
Galaxy A80 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG G7 Fit features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A80 counts with superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3700mAh battery size. Galaxy A80 captures much better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.