Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 84.9 score against 81. Even though the Galaxy A80 is newer than LG G7 ThinQ, it's notably heavier and thicker. LG G7 ThinQ has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A80 has a bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with way more MP.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A80 features greater battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.