Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is slightly better than LG G8 ThinQ, getting an 84.9 score against 84.3. Even being the best we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A80 body is way heavier and thicker than the LG G8 ThinQ. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G8 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little better battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 6% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a lot smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.