Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, getting an 84.9 score against 82.7. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A80 is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than LG G8X ThinQ. The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A80, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG G8X ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a lot more mega pixels camera.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.