Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A80's 84.9 general score. The LG K92 design is newer, a bit lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A80. Galaxy A80 features a bit superior CPU than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG K92 has a screen that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A80, both of them have a higher pixels count per screen inch, a display of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. LG K92 takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
The LG K92 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.