Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-05-29 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a general score of 84.9 against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a a lot newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it's a lot thicker and heavier. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A80 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of 2200 MHz cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features just a little better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 6 percent more battery capacity. Galaxy A80 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.