Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-05-29 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Play's general score of 77.4. The Galaxy A80 is a newer device than the Moto Z2 Play, but it's heavier and incredibly thicker. Moto Z2 Play has a screen that is just as good as the display in Galaxy A80, because although the Moto Z2 Play has a little smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a quite greater screen density.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a superior camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A80 features improved battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.