Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-29 | -- |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is slightly better than Nokia 9.3 PureView, getting an 84.9 score against 84.2. Nokia 9.3 PureView has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Nokia 9.3 PureView also has a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a bit greater pixel count per display inch.
Nokia 9.3 PureView has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Nokia 9.3 PureView features as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Samsung Galaxy A80 one, they have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Nokia 9.3 PureView has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. Nokia 9.3 PureView features a way better camera than Galaxy A80, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot better video definition, a larger camera aperture and a much larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.