Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a general score of 84.9 against 83.1. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Galaxy A80 construction is older, a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than OPPO Find X2 Pro. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures and videos.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.