Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-05-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A80's score of 84.9. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A80. Galaxy A52 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52's processing unit is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A80's CPU, and although the Galaxy A52 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy A52 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 22% greater battery size. Galaxy A52 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger camera aperture, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a much better 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.