Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a general score of 84.9 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A80 design is newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A6. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a larger display.
Galaxy A80 features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A80 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a camera with way more megapixels, a much larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy A80 has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.