Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than the Galaxy A80, getting a general score of 97.6 against 84.9. Galaxy Fold's body is notably heavier but notably thinner than the Galaxy A80, and they were only released with a few months difference. Galaxy Fold has a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A80 one, because although the Galaxy Fold has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a little larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A80 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in poorly lited environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy Fold has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little longer battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.