Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A80's 84.9 global score. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer device, and it is also just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A80. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit bigger screen and a better pixels count per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A80, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has a 22% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.