Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy A80, having a global score of 95.4 against 84.9. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is a lot newer and a bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A80. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper display than Galaxy A80, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a better pixels count per inch of screen and a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A80. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a way more megapixels camera, a much higher video quality, a larger aperture and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A80's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.