Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-29 | -- |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A80, having a global score of 90.7 against 84.9. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is noticeably lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A80. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a quite bigger display, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a better screen density.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A80 has a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much higher resolution camera and a larger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.