Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. Galaxy A80's design weights the same than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro's processor is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A80 one, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A80 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a way higher video quality and a way larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.