Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than Galaxy A80, getting an 88.5 score against 84.9. The Galaxy Z Flip design is lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy A80, even though they were only released 9 months apart. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A80. They have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3700mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.