Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy A80's overall score of 84.9. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is somewhat heavier than Galaxy A80, it's extremely thinner and also way newer. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Samsung Galaxy A80 both have quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot more MP camera in the back. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 19% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.