Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's 83.1 general score. Galaxy A80 has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a little bit higher 1220 x 2710px resolution and a just a bit better screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has a 38% more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.