Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro has a score of 84.9, which is better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s global score of 74.9. IPhone 11 Pro is a much newer and a bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is also just a little bit thicker. Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a greater pixels count per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) has slightly more memory to store more apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The iPhone 11 Pro has a better performing processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and more RAM.
Galaxy A9 (2016) features better battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower video definition and a back-facing camera with a lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.