Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having a general score of 86.6 against 74.9. IPhone SE (2022) is a a lot lighter phone than the Galaxy A9 (2016), but both of them are equally thin. IPhone SE (2022) has a quite better performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone SE (2022) has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it has a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334, a much smaller display and a quite lower count of pixels per inch of display. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a much better battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 98% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.