Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 general score. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is a extremely newer phone than Galaxy A9 (2016), but it is thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a very superior processing power than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit larger screen, a bit better pixels quantity per screen inch and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 5500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.