Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016), with an 81.2 score against 74.9. Although the Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit thicker than Galaxy A9 (2016), it's just a little bit lighter and also extremely newer. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712, a little bit bigger display and a little bit greater display density. The Motorola Edge 50 features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger aperture and a way more mega pixels camera.
Motorola Edge 50 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.