Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Mystic indigo |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is slightly better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having a general score of 79.7 against 74.9. Moto G Stylus's body is much newer and a little bit lighter, but also thicker than Galaxy A9 (2016). Moto G Stylus counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G Stylus also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a slightly better display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300 and a little bit greater pixels number in each screen inch. Moto G Stylus shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus and Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) feature similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.