Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 367 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), having a overall score of 79.2 against 74.9. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is notably newer, a little bit lighter and incredibly thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a way better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) features a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture to take better low light photography.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.