Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 367 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), having an 84.7 score against 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a incredibly newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is a little bit heavier and thicker. Galaxy A32 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A9 (2016) has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a greater count of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 has improved battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.