Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 overall score. Galaxy A71 5G's construction is incredibly newer and a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it is a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.