Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-01-01 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black and Gold |
| Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s overall score of 74.9. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is newer, just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A9 (2016). Galaxy C9 Pro has a display that is just as good as the screen in Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), both of them have an equal 1080 x 1920px resolution, the same pixels density and a display of the same size.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a battery performance that's very similar to the Galaxy A9 (2016) one. The Galaxy A9 (2016) captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a worse 13 megapixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A9 (2016) also counts with a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.