Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a 77.8 score against 74.9. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a extremely newer and notably thinner cellphone than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is just a bit heavier. The Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a much bigger display and a little greater pixels count in each inch in the display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 43 percent larger battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a way better video quality, a bigger camera aperture and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.