Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), having a overall score of 78.8 against 74.9. Vivo X60 Pro's construction is way newer and lighter, but also a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The vivo X60 Pro has a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite larger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a little bit better display density. The vivo X60 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and better video frame rate. The vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.