Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2016-01-01 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 global score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a notably newer and just a bit lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), but it's also thicker. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2246 resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy A9 (2016)'s battery life. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels and a worse (4K) video quality, they both have a F1.9 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.