Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a a little heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Motorola Edge 50 has a better screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite better 1220 x 2712px resolution, a little higher display pixel density and a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A9 (2018) features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 50 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.