Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting an 84.9 score against 74.4. Even though iPhone 11 Pro is just a little thicker than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's somewhat lighter and newer. The iPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
IPhone 11 Pro has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3046mAh.
IPhone 11 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.