Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. IPhone SE (2022) comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. The iPhone SE (2022) construction is incredibly newer, much lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
IPhone SE (2022) counts with a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone SE (2022) features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a much lower 750 x 1334px resolution, a just a little worse pixels count in each inch in the screen and a way smaller screen.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a way less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a greater storage for games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much better battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.