Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a 77 score against 74.4. Even when LG V20 and the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) were released with only 6 months difference, LG V20 is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. LG V20 and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) both have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the LG V20 has lesser cpu cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM.
The LG V20 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. LG V20 counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. LG V20 features a greater camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a 16 mega-pixels resolution camera and a 0.36 inches back camera sensor, the LG V20 also has a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.