Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 score. Motorola Droid Turbo's design is somewhat lighter than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's way thicker and was released a little bit more than a year before. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 20.7 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) also has an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.