Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a 77.9 score against 74.4. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola DROID Turbo's body is somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's way thicker and was released only 17 months before.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has less RAM and lesser cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a way better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and way more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features greater battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.