Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting an 80.9 score against 74.4. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra body is noticeably newer and a little bit lighter, but a little thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). These devices include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has older 12 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit greater display density, a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a battery life that is just as good as Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.