Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Motorola Edge 50 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but both have the same thickness. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has the previous 14 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Motorola Edge 50 has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a better resolution of 1220 x 2712px, a bit larger display and a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) and Motorola Edge 50 both have incredibly similar battery performance. Motorola Edge 50 has a way better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a much better resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture and a lot bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.